TRI PRAMANA CONCEPT AS LEARNING APPROACH TO DEVELOP A LIFELONG LEARNER

Dewa Made Dwicky Putra Nugraha

Dewa Made Dwicky Putra Nugraha Universitas Dwijendra

Keywords: tri pramana, learning approach, lifelong learner

Abstract

Lifelong learning is a concept of continuous learning in line with the developmental phases of humans. The practice of lifelong learners throughout formal education needs a relevant learning approach. Tri Pramana are three manners or ways to gain knowledge or truth namely, Praktyaksa Pramana, Anumana Pramana, and Sabda Pramana. This study aims at describing the Tri Pramana concept as a learning approach to develop lifelong learners. The method of the research was research library. The data were collected through the recording of documents on various relevant sources of books, research journals, and other literature the research objectives. The findings of the data collection process were documented and analyzed descriptively. The finding shows that the Tri Pramana-based learning approach can be implemented into several learning cycles consisting of PSA, PAS, SPA, SAP, APS, and ASP. Tri Pramana as a learning approach is significantly relevant to the need to develop lifelong learners. Generally, Tri Pramana-based learning is able to; 1) provide self-regulated learning on students, 2) foster a logical and open attitude in responding to problems, and 3) enable for continuous collaboration.

References

Ariestini, I Made, A., & I Nym, Dibia, I. K. (2013). Pengaruh Model Siklus Belajar Berdasarkan Konsep Tri Pramana. E-Jurnal Pendidikan Ganesha.
Andretta, S. (2005). Information literacy: A practitioner’s guide. Elsevier.
Atmaja, S. M. N. P., Agung, A. A. G., & Agustiana, I. G. A. T. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri di Sambirenteng. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 1(1). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/784/657
Bonnes, C., & Hochholdinger, S. (2020). Approaches to Teaching in Professional Training: a Qualitative Study. Vocations and Learning, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09244-2
Chen, Z. (2015). The Analysis And Researching On The Essences Of The Lifelong Education, Lifelong Learning And Learning Society. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 2(10).
Cropley, A. J. (Ed.). (2014). Towards a system of lifelong education: Some practical considerations (Vol. 7). Elsevier.
Duwijo, D., & Susila, K. (2017). Pendidikan Agama Hindu dan Budi Pekerti: buku guru (SD Kelas IV).
Field, J. (2001). Lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(1–2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280010008291
Hairani, E. (2018). Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat Menuju Masyarakat Berpengetahuan. TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v2i1.107
Herawati. (2018). Memahami proses belajar anak. Jurnal UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, IV.
Hufad, A., Pramudia, J. R., & Supariatna, S. (2010). Studi tentang Implementasi Program Belajar Sepanjang Hayat di Indonesia. 4–10. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/PROCEEDING/Seminar_Internas.NFE/STUDI_TENTANG_IMPLEMENTASI_PROGRAM_BELAJAR_SEPANJANG_HAYAT_DI_INDONESIA.pdf.
Isa, A. H., & Napu, Y. (2020). Pendidikan Sepanjang Hayat. In Jurnal Pendidikan (Vol. 2).
Kazu, I. Y. (2009). The Effect of Learning Styles on Education and the Teaching Process. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.85.94
Mahendra, P. R. A., & Darwati, G. A. M. (2016). PSIKOLOGI PENDIDIKAN BAGI PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Widya Accarya FKIP Universitas Dwijendra.
McLeod, S. (2018). Maslow ’ s Hierarchy of Needs Maslow ’ s Hierarchy of Needs. Business.
Miller, K. (2020). the Triple Bottom Line: What It Is & Why It’S Important. Harvard Business School.
Montalvo, F. T., & Torres, M. C. G. (2004). Self-regulated learning: Current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(3).
Nugraha, D. M. D. P. (2021). Station Rotation Type Blended Learning Model Against Critical Thinking Ability of Fourth Grade Students. Journal of Education Technology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i4.29690
Prasedari, L. P. E., Pujdawan, K., & Suranata, K. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berorientasi Tri Pramana Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas IV. Inopendas Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(2).
Rijal, S., & Bachtiar, S. (2015). Hubungan antara Sikap, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v3i2.4149
Rogers, A. (2005). Non-Formal Education. In Non-Formal Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28693-4
Santyasa, I. wayan. (2018). Student centered learning : Alternatif pembelajaran inovatif abad 21 untuk menyiapkan guru profesional. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Quantum, 25.
Seken, I. K., & Badra, I. K. (2019). Tri Pramana sebagai Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Agama Hindu dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Hindu di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Lampuhyang, 10(1).
Subagia, I. W., & Lanang Wiratma, I. G. (2009). Evaluasi Penerapan Model Siklus Belajar Berbasis Tri Pramana Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Di Sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 42, 89–96.
Suteja, J. (2017). Model-Model Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi KKNI di Perguruan Tinggi (Perubahan dari Teacher Centered Learning ke Arah Student Centered Learning). Jurnal Edueksos, VI(1).
Ummu, K. (2009). Konsep Belajar Sepanjang Hayat Universitas Medan Area. 14.
Wijaya, I. K. W. B. (2019). Pembelajaran Sains Anak Usia Dini Dengan Konsep Tri Pramana. In Seminar Nasional Anak Usia Dini.