MIGRATION IN DENPASAR CITY: STUDY OF ADAPTATION STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLICATION OF SOCIAL CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
Denpasar City, both as the capital of Bali as well as the center of trade, education, and tourism destinations. This potential is a strong attraction for the migrants to come and settle in the city of Denpasar. The purposes of this study are: 1) to get an overview of the characteristics of the migrants; 2) understanding the pattern of migrant adaptation; and 3) to analyze its implications of socio-cultural and environment. The approach method used is descriptive qualitative. Data collection used through structured interviews, observation, and Focus Group Discussion. Based on the analysis, this study found that the average age of migrants classified as productive, is in the range 30-40 years. The level of education of migrants is quite good, mostly high school and even some university grade. The pattern of adaptation that is done tends to choose clustered residence based on the similarity of ethnic and religion background.The socio-cultural implications have not been so apparent, that local culture still dominant. The implications for the environment appear to be quite significant, which is marked by the increasing number of land conversion for various designations. The emergence of slums and semi-permanent settlements built to meet the needs of many migrants throughout the sub district in Denpasar. This condition then injured the icon of Denpasar as a cultural city. Beside that, the quality of environments and raw water of the population has decreased, caused due of domestic household waste and wastewater of the garment industry and laundry services.
References
Agger, Ben. 2003. Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Anderson, Benedict. 1999. Komunitas-Komunitas Terbayang Renungan Tentang Asal Usul dan Penyebaran Nasionalisme. Alih Bahasa Omi Intan Naomi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Atmadja, Nengah Bawa. 2005, “Bali Pada Era Globalisasi: Pulau Seribu Pura Tidak Seindah Penampilannya” (hasil penelitian – studi kasus pada berbagai desa), Singaraja: Universitas Ganesa.
Ayatrohaedi. (Ed.), 1986. Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa (Lokal Genius), Jakarta. Pustaka Jaya.
Baidhawy, Zakiyudin. 2002. Ambivalensi Agama Konflik & Nirkekerasan. Yogyakarta: LESFI.
Balipost, Edisi 09 Agustus 2011. “Perda Kependudukan Sering Dilanggar”.
Bappeda Kota Denpasar. 2015. Denpasar Dalam Angka Tahun 2015. Denpasar: Pemerintah Kota Denpasar.
Bennet, John. 1976. The Ecological Transition, Cultural Anthropology & Human Adaptation. New York: Pergamon Press.
Berger-Schmitt. 2000. Social Cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of Societies: Concept and Measurement.EuReporting Working Paper No 14.
Budiman, Hikmat (ed). 2005. Hak Minoritas Dilema Multikulturisme di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Interseksi/The Interseksi Foundation.
Campbell, Tom. 1994. Tujuh Teori Sosial: Sketsa, Penilaian, Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Colletta, Nat J., Teck Ghee Lim, Anita Kelles-Viitanen. 2001. Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention in Asia: Managing Diversity through Development. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Daeng, Hans J. 2008. Manusia, Kebudayaan, dan Lingkungan Tinjauan Antropologis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Ellen, Roy. 1982. Environment, Subsistence, & System. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garna, Judistira K. 1992. Teori-Teori Perubahan Sosial. Bandung: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Padjadjaran.
Geriya, I Wayan. 2000. Transformasi Kebudayaan Bali Memasuki Abad XXI. Denpasar: Dinas Kebudayaan Propinsi Bali.
Hardesty, Richard W. 1977. Ecological Anthropology. New York: John Wiley & Suns.
Kaplan, David & Robert.A. Manners. 2002. Teori Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Miles & Huberman, A. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Mulyana, Deddy. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurkhoiron, M. 2007. “Minoritisasi dan Agenda Multikulturalisme di Indonesia: Sebuah Catatan Awal”, dalam Hak Minoritas Multikulturalisme dan Dilema Negara Bangsa. Editor: Marsudi Noorsalim, dkk. Jakarta: Yayasan Interseksi/The Interseksi Foundation.
Parekh, Bhiku. 2007. Rethinking Multikulturalism Keberagaman Budaya dan Teori Politik. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Poerwanto, Hari. 2008. Kebudayaan dan Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Antropologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ritzen et al. 2000. “Good”Politicians and “Bad” Policies: Social Cohesion,Institutions and Growth. World Bank. Jo Ritzen,William Easterly, dan Michael Woolcock (September) Policy Research Working Paper 2448.
Ritzer, George & Goodman, Douglas J. 2005. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Sahlins, Marshall.1976. Culture and Practice Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Saifuddin, F.A., (2005). Antropologi Kontemporer Suatu Pengantar Kritis Mengenai Paradigma. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Sanderson, Stephen K. 2003. Makro Sosiologi, Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Realitas Sosial. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafinfdo Persada.
Soetrisno, L. 2003. Konflik Sosial Studi Kasus Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Tajidu Press.
Steward, Julian. 1956, “Cultural Evolution”. In Scientific American, 1956, No.5, pp.70-80
Suaedy, Ahmad, dkk. 2007. Politisasi Agama dan Konflik Komunal Beberapa Isu Penting di Indonesia. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute.
Sutopo dan Adi Suryanto. 2006. Pelayanan Prima. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia.
Suyanto, Bagong dan Sutinah (editor). 2005. Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Tilaar, H.A.R.2004. Multikulturalisme Tantangan-tantangan Global Masa Depan dalam Transformasi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Zuriah, Nurul. 2005. Pendidikan Moral dan Budi Pekerti dalam Prespektif Perubahan. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.
