ANALYZING THE ANDRAGOGY PRINCIPLES TO BOOST LITERACY SKILLS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Abstract
Literacy is a fundamental skill that university students should master to reach greater
academic achievement. Dealing with university students requires a certain approach
and learning theory. The influence of the andragogy theory by Knowles in teaching
university students cannot be ruled out. This research aims to analyze the andragogy
principles in teaching and learning activities of sixth-semester students in the
research methodology course of English Language Education, The Faculty of
Teacher Training and Pedagogy, Dwijendra University. This research is qualitative
research where the data were collected from in-depth observation and interviews
with an English lecturer. The data were analyzed qualitatively by referring to
Knowles' (1984) principles of andragogy which include (1) adults need to be involved
in the planning and evaluation of their instruction, (2) experience provides the basis
for the learning activities, (3) adults are most interested in learning subjects that have
immediate relevance and impact to their job or personal life, and (4) adult learning is
problem-centered rather than content-oriented. The finding shows that the principles
have been inserted in various learning activities to boost the literacy skills of sixthsemester students. The data shows that principles are potentially beneficial to
dealing with university students due to their learning styles and students’
characteristics.
References
2022). Retrieved March 20, 2024, from Databoks website:
https://l1nq.com/CX8jJ
Akhter, T. (2014). A case study of literacy and its development in India. ZENITH
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4, 1–9.
Daley, E. (2003). Expanding the Concept of Literacy. Educational Review, 38, 32–
40.
Ekoto, C., & Gaikwad, P. (2015). The Impact of Andragogy on Learning Satisfaction
of Graduate Students. American Journal of Educational Research, (3), 1378–
1386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12691/EDUCATION-3-11-6
Haeussler, R. (2012). Literacy, Rome, and provinces. Wiley Online Library.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444338386.WBEAH22182.
Hagen, M., & Park, S. (2016). We Knew It All Along! Using Cognitive Science to
Explain How Andragogy Works. European Journal of Training and
Development, 40, 171–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-
2015-0081.
Henschke, J. (2011). Considerations Regarding the Future of Andragogy. Adult
Learning, (22), 34–37.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/104515951102200109
Hodgson, J. (2019). Literary literacy? English in Education, (53).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1613093.
Hsu, H.-C., & Hsu, H.-L. (2020). Action Research for Using Problem Based Learning
in Adult Education. International Conference on Social Science and Higher
Education.
Huettig, F., & Pickering, M. (2019). Literacy Advantages Beyond Reading: Prediction
of Spoken Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008.
Innocent, B. O. (2021). The impact of effective planning on teaching and learning
among some selected secondary school students in Ethiope West Local
Government Area of Delta State. Direct Research Journal of Education and
Vocational Studies, 3(December), 113–120.
Kerwin, M. (1981). Andragogy in the Community College. Community College
Review, (9), 12–14.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009155218100900303
Knowles, M., III, E., Swanson, R., & Robinson, P. (2020). Andragogy. The Adult
Learner. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612-3.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles Of Adult
Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Langer, J., Bloome, D., Castell, S., Luke, A., Egan, K., Olson, D., … Hildyard, A.
(1985). Literacy, Language, and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of
Reading and Writing. Educational Researcher.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/327332.
Loeng, S. (2018). Various ways of understanding the concept of andragogy. Cogent
Education, (5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496643
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data
Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Miranda, N. (2021). The Impact of Illiteracy and the Importance of Early Intervention.
Retrieved April 12, 2023, from World Literacy Foundation website:
https://worldliteracyfoundation.org/early-intervention-reduces-illiteracy/
Mulia, V. L. C. (2016). The Contributions of Literacy Skills to National Development.
LEKSEMA, 1(2).
Norman, Z. D. (2022). Elaborating the Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning
Experiences on Students’ Engagement and Social & Academic Success in
Public School STEM Education. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1).
Note, N., Backer, F., & Donder, L. (2020). A Novel Viewpoint on Andragogy: Enabling
Moments of Community. Adult Education Quarterly, (71), 3–19.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620921361.
Susila, I. K. D. (2021). Utilization of Classcraft in Developing Positive Student
Behavior. Journal of Education Technology, 4(4).
Susila, I. K. D. (2023). The Effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning
(MALL) through Quizlet Application to Improve Vocabulary in English for
Waiter/ss. The International Conference on Multi-Disciplines Approaches for
The Sustainable Development. Denpasar: Dwijendra University.