PENGARUH MAKNA INTERPERSONAL ANTARA GURU DAN SISWA DALAM STRATEGI KEDISIPLINAN (KAJIAN LINGUISTIK SISTEMIK FUNGSIONAL)

  • Putri Ariadne Prajnaparamytha Linguistik, Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Keywords: Functional Systemic Linguistics, Interpersonal, Gender

Abstract

This study attempts to examine the interpersonal meaning between teachers and students in a senior high school (SMAN) in Bandung in a discipline strategy. The Data analysis uses systemic functional linguistic studies (SFL) to identify interpersonal meanings of teachers and students through a sign system that can be analyzed based on language structure and language usage. In addition, researcher want to reveal how language is used and organized, deals with the grammar used as a basic for speakers to produce more functional meaning. This research uses descriptive method through a qualitative approach. The data source is in the form of field observation technique because the data used are in the form of conversations between teachers and students that are transcribed through a text. The results of this study will show about the extent of speech functions influence heard by speakers and hearers in disciplinary strategies at school and gender issues influence of speakers and hearers in disciplinary strategies at school. The conclusion of this paper will prove that there are various influences from disciplinary strategies at school based on the style of language used by speakers which are also influenced by the gender differences between speakers and hearers.

References

Chairani, Mustika., Ida Wiendijarti., dan Dewi Novianti. 2009. Komunikasi Interpersonal Guru dan Orang Tua Siswa Dalam Mencegah Kenakalan Remaja Pada Siswa (Studi Deskriptif Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Colombo Sleman). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. Vol. 7 No. 2. Agustus Hal. 143-152. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/komunikasi/article/download/17/17 &hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1iawGZi9k1CCuPDUaIXteLIVQN-&nossl=1&oi=scholarr (diunduh pada tanggal 17 November 2019).

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Luingustics. New York: Continum International Publishing Group.

Faradi, Abdul Aziz. 2015. Kajian Modalitas Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik Pada Teks Debat Capres-Cawapres Pada Pilpres 2014-2019 dan Relevansinya Dengan Pembelajaran Wacana di Sekolah. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa. Vol. 1. No. 2. Oktober. Hal. 233-249. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/jret/article/download/31/30 (diunduh pada tanggal 16 Oktober 2019).

Feng, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Analysis of interpesonal meaning in public speeches-a case study of Obama’s speech. Jornal of Language Teaching and Research. 1(6), 828-829.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. dan Christian Matthiessen.An Introduction To Functional Grammar. Third Edition. 2004. London: Edward Arnold.

Maiz-Arevalo, C., & Gracia Gomez, A. (2013). ‘You look terrific! Social evaluation and relationships in online compliments. Discours Studies, 15(6), 321-344.

Punyanunt-Carter, N.M. (2005). Father and daughter motives and satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 22(4), 293-301.

Saifullah, Aceng Ruhendi. 2018. Semantik dan Dinamika Pergulatan Makna. Bandung: Bumi Aksara

Sanders, J. (2006). Gender Smart: Memecahkan Teka-teki komunikasi antara pria dan wanita. (C. Kristiastanti, Penerj.). Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Saragih, Bahagia. 2016. Linguistik Fungsional: Dimensi Dalam Bahasa. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/bahas/article/view/5672/5084 (diunduh pada tanggal 17 Oktober 2019).

Published
2019-12-20