ADAPTATION, PREVALENCE, AND POST-HARVEST SHELF LIFE OF SALAK CULTIVARS
Abstrak
Salak (snake fruit) cultivars in production centers exhibit remarkable diversity, distinguished by variations in shape, aroma, taste, and skin color. However, the adaptation of each cultivar, the dominance of specific types, and the shelf life of the dominant cultivars remain poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and dominance of salak cultivars and analyze the shelf life of the most widely cultivated types. The research was conducted in villages recognized as salak development centers in Bali, using a survey method. Activities included collecting secondary data, field observations, sampling, interviews with farmers, and laboratory analyses. Surveys were conducted across agroecosystems at altitudes of 450–780 meters above sea level, with locations selected through purposive sampling. Type dominance (D) was calculated using the formula: D = (types found / total found) × 100%. Shelf life assessment of dominant salak types was conducted using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four replications. The study identified 16 salak types: 16 types in Sibetan- Karangasem; 6 in Pupuan-Tabanan; and 4 in each of Tembuku-Bangli; Kerta-Gianyar; Petang-Badung; and Busungbiu-Buleleng. Among these, the Gulapasir cultivar demonstrated the widest adaptation and dominant, followed by Nangka, Nenas, and Gondok. No significant differences in shelf life were observed among these cultivars. After 7,5 days of storage, salak fruit began to deteriorate and eventually rot.
Referensi
https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.742
Ashari S. 2013. Salak: The Snake Fruit. UB Press, Malang, Indonesia
Cepkova PH, Jagr M, Janovska D, Dvoracek V, Kozak AK, and Viehmannova I. 2021.Comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis of snake fruit: Salak (Salacca zalacca). J. Food Qual., Article ID 6621811: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621811.
Fenech M, Amaya I, Valpuesta V and Botella MA. 2019. Vitamin C content in fruits: biosynthesis and regulation. Front. Plant Sci.9(2006): 1–21. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2018.02006
Girsang E, Lister INE, Ginting CN, Khu A, Samin B, Widowati W, Wibowo S and Rizal R. 2019. Chemical constituents of snake fruit (Salacca zalacca (Gaert.) Voss) peel and in silico anti-aging analysis. Molecular and Cellular Biomedical Sciences, 3(2): 122–128. https://doi10.21705/mcbs.v3i2.80
Hakim L, Widyorini R, Nugroho WD and Prayitno TA. 2019. Anatomical, chemical, and mechanical properties of fibrovascularbundles of salacca (snake fruit) frond. Bioresources, 14(4): 7943–7957. http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.4.7943-7957.
Kumar N, Kumar A, Jeena N, Singh R and Singh H. 2020. Factors influencing soil ecosystem and agricultural productivity at higher altitudes. In: Goel R, Soni R and Suyal D (Eds), Microbiological Advancements for Higher Altitude Agro-Ecosystems & Sustainability. Rhizosphere Biology. Springer Nature, Singapore. pp.55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1902-44
Lestari R, Ebert G and Keil SH. 2011. Growth and physiological responses of salak cultivars (Salacca zalacca (Gaertn.) Voss) to different growing media. J. Agric. Sci. 3(4): 261–271. http://doi10.5539/jas.v3n4p261
Mazumdar P, Pratama H, Lau SE, Teo CH and Harikrishna JA. 2019. Biology, phytochemical profile and prospects for snake fruit: An antioxidant-rich fruit of South East Asia. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 91: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.017
Prihastanti E and Haryanti S. 2022. The combination of plant growth regulators (GA3 and Gracilaria sp. extract) and several fertilisers in Salak Pondoh fruit production. Hort. Sci., 49(2): 109–116.https://doi.org/10.17221/102/2021-HORTSCI
Raharjo G, Saidi D and Afany MR. 2022. Soil quality in cultivation land of snakefruit (Salacca edulis) in Ledoknongko, Bangunkerto Village, Turi, Sleman Yogyakarta Indonesia. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci.6(5): 27–31.
SK Mentan 1994a. Decree of the Minister of Agriculture - No.585/Kpts/TP.240/7/94, date 23 Juli 1994, on Bali salak.
SK Mentan 1994b. Decree of the Minister of Agriculture No.584/Kpts /TP.240 /7/94, date 23 Juli 1994 on Gulapasir salak
Sukewijaya IM, Nyoman R and Mahendra MS. 2009. Development of Salak Bali as an organic fruit. As. J. Food Ag-Ind. Special Issue: S37– S43
Sumantra K, Ashari S, Wardiyati T and Suryanto A. 2012. Diversity of shade trees and their influence on the microclimate of agro-ecosystem and fruit production of Gulapasir Salak (Salacca Zalacca var. Amboinensis) fruit. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci.12(06): 214–221.
Sumantra K, Labek SIN and Ashari S. 2014. Heat unit, phenology and fruit quality of salak (Salacca zalacca var. amboinensis) cv. Gulapasir on different elevation in Tabanan regency-Bali. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 3(2): 102–107. https://doi10.11648/j.aff.20140302.18.
Sumantra K and Martiningsih E. 2016. Evaluation of the superior characters of salak Gulapasir cultivars in two harvest seasons at the new development area in Bali. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 16(06):19–22.
Sumantra K and Martiningsih E. 2018. The agroecosystem of salak Gulapasir (Salacca zalacca var. amboinensis) in new development areas in Bali. Proceedings of International Symposia on Horticulture (ISH), Kuta, Bali. Indonesian Center for Horticulture Research and Development pp. 19– 28.
Sumantra K, Tamba M, Partama Y, Sukerta M and Ariati PEP. 2022. Mapping potential for superior food in Bali: Sub-study of agro-ecosystem, post-harvest and marketing chain of salak commodity. Research Report.Bali Regional Research and Innovation Agency. Bali Province.
Sumantra, IK, Widnyana, Tamba, Eka, Adinurani, Ekawati, Maizirwan, Peeyush Son. 2023. Agronomic Characters and Quality of Fruit of Salak cv. Gulapasir Planted in Various Agro-Ecosystems. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16 (02) 207-2021. https://doi.org/10.54319/jjbs/160205.
Sumantra, IK. Listiani, PEP Ariati. 2024. Diversity of Salacca zalacca (Gaertn.) Voss from Bali, Indonesia based on morphological and molecular characters. BIODIVERSITAS. 25 (04): 1771-1780. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d250447