DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS BASED ON IMO STANDARS FOR NAVIGATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS
Abstract
Effective communication is pivotal in the maritime industry, where safety and efficiency depend on clear interactions among crew members, ships, and shore-based stations. Maritime English, supported by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Standard Marine Communication Phrases (SMCP), serves as a universal framework to mitigate miscommunication risks in safety-critical scenarios. However, many maritime learners face challenges due to the technical complexity of the language, diverse linguistic backgrounds, and insufficient alignment of existing learning materials with IMO standards. This study adopts a library-based methodology to explore the development of Maritime English learning materials tailored for navigational communication. By analyzing existing literature, IMO documents, and instructional design principles, the research identifies critical gaps in current educational resources. The findings highlight the importance of task-based learning and multimodal resources, such as simulations and interactive exercises, to enhance learner engagement and practical application of Maritime English. Furthermore, integrating the SMCP into these materials ensures alignment with international standards, fostering clear and effective communication. The study contributes to maritime education by proposing innovative, standards-based learning materials that bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world application. These resources aim to equip seafarers with the linguistic proficiency and confidence required for effective navigational communication, thereby supporting global maritime safety and operational efficiency. The research outcomes also serve as a foundation for future advancements in specialized language training across other technical domains.
References
Andriana, S. P., Zhenkai, Z., Ben-Bright, B., Ghansah, B., & Ansah, E. (2018). A survey of advanced marine communication and navigation technologies: Developments and strategies. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 34(January), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.34.102
Bocanegra‐Valle, A. (2012). Maritime English. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, January 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0746
Chowdhury, M. N., Shafi, S., Mohd Arzaman, A. F., Teoh, B. A., Kadhim, K. A., Salamun, H., Abdul Kadir, F. K., Said, S., Kadir, K. A., Embong, A. M., Abdul Aziz, N. A., Jusoh, M. H., Phuoc Pham, L. H. H., & Si Xuan, A. N. (2024). Navigating Human Factors in Maritime Safety: A Review of Risks and Improvements in Engine Rooms of Ocean-Going Vessels. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.140101
Čulić-Viskota, A., & Denc, M. (2016). From Content-Centeredness to Learner-Centeredness in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Transactions on Maritime Science, 5(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v05.n02.008
Diahyleva, O. S., Yurzhenko, A. Y., & Kononova, O. Y. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of online learning tools and technologies while teaching Maritime English to future ship engineers. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.711
Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2018). The Need Analysis of Maritime English Learning Materials for Nautical Students of Maritime Academy in Indonesia Based on STCW’2010 Curriculum. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p41
Dlabač, T., Dževerdanović Pejović, M., Nikčević, J., & Kapetanović, V. (2022). The importance of Maritime Education and Training quality control: the Case of Montenegro. April, 6. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://icts.sdzp.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ICTS-2022_abstracts_draft-1.pdf
Farjami Asst, F. (2024). Wrong Use of SMCP in Marine Communication: A Review Study. 4(December), 1–12.
Franceschi, D. (2014). The Features of Maritime English Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p78
Haqimin Mohd Salleh, N., Jeevan, J., Md Hanafiah, R., Hafaz Ngah, A., M Salleh, N. H., Alias, N. A., Jeevan, J., Hanafiah, R. M., & Ngah, A. H. (2019). A Perspective of Malaysian Marine Training Providers and Shipowners on Communication
Issues Onboard Merchant Vessels ☆. International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 11(December), 33–043. http://www.e-navigation.kr/
Hellystia, D., & Budiwaty, S. (2023). Communication Skills-Based Need Analysis on the Teaching and Learning of Maritime English for Vocational School. Journal of Language and Literature, 11(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.35760/jll.2023.v11i1.6444
James, A. J., Schriever, U. G., Jahangiri, S., & Girgin, S. C. (2018). Improving maritime English competence as the cornerstone of safety at sea: a focus on teaching practices to improve maritime communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0145-4
Jurdzinski, M. (2018). Changing the Model of Maritime Navigation. In TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation (Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 35–41). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.12.01.03
K, R. (2015). Research Methods in Library and Information Science. Current Trends in Information Technology, August. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68749
Kumar, N., & Rajini, G. (2023). Reimaging maritime education and training using latest technologies. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024895
Liton, H. A. (2021). Streamlining an Effective Maritime English for future Maritime Professionals: A View from Pragmatic Perspective. December 2017.
Madoyan, L. (2016). Authenticity and Teacher’s Role in Project Based Learning. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 12(2 (16)), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.46991/afa/2016.12.2.109
Mujiyanto, J., Hartono, R., & Yuliasri, I. (2023). The Essential of Using Standard Marine Communication Phrases in Avoiding Accidents at Sea for Indonesian Seafarers. Ijevss, 02(02), 2023.
Ngadiso, N., Sarosa, T., Asrori, M., Drajati, N. A., & Handayani, A. (2021). Project-based Learning (PBL) in EFL learning: Lesson from Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1114–1122. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.558
Pejaković, S. K. (2015). Maritime English Language – General Features.
Sari, L. I., & Sari, R. H. (2020). ESP Course Book Evaluation from the Perspectives of Teachers, Cadets, and Graduates: The Case of Maritime English. 434(Iconelt 2019), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.013
Saridaki, E. (2023). The necessity of Maritime English for the shipping industry. The Journal of Academic Social Resources, Cilt 8 Sayı 45(Cilt 8 Sayı 45), 1908–1913. https://doi.org/10.29228/asrjournal.67256
Ziarati, R., Koivisto, H., & Uriasz, J. (2009). Development of standards for maritime english - The EU Leonardo martel project. 10th Annual General Assembly 2009 - International Association of Maritime Universities (IAMU), June 2014, 333–340.
Ziarati1, M., Ziarati, R., Bigland, O., & Acar, U. (2011). Communication and practical training applied in nautical studies. International Maritime Lecturers’ Association (IMLA), The International Maritime English Conference Proceedings Of Imec, 23(October 2011), 41.