CHALLENGE OF CROSS-CULTURAL CORPORATE COMMUNICATION IN ENGLISH WITHIN GLOBAL WORKPLACE

  • MAJOR (NCC) SUPREMAKAR MONDITHOKA

Abstrak

In the current globalized marketplace, English has emerged as the main communication medium in businesses in the workplace around the world. Although English has served as a common ground, cross-cultural differences in communication styles, attitudes, and perceptions tend to pose challenges that hamper organizational productivity, teamwork and employee morale. This paper will look at some of the major pitfalls of cross-cultural corporate communication in English when it comes to multinational organizations such as misinterpretation of meaning, and various communication norms, hierarchical perception and non-verbal cues. By means of an integrative interpretation of the available literature and through case-related reflections, the research reveals linguistic and cultural obstacles to efficient interaction. A qualitative approach based on secondary data was used and entailed a synthesis of academic publications and organizational reports. The results suggest that being skilled in English is not enough; cultural intelligence and intercultural preparation, inclusive communication strategies are no less important to eliminate miscommunication. Of great importance is a focus on practical solutions, including adaptive leadership, intercultural workshops, and digital communication tool application. The paper will conclude that in the future global workplace, intercultural competence, in addition to English proficiency is needed in order to maintain productiveness and harmony. There are practical constraints form the use of secondary data and the lack of primary field information that can limit the contextual extrapolation. Future perspectives would require investigations based on empirical analysis and multinational case studies and the creation of AI-based communication support systems to maximize clarity in cross-cultural corporate environments.

Referensi

Jaedun, M. Nurtanto, F. Mutohhari, I. N. Saputro, and N. Kholifah, “Perceptions of vocational school students and teachers on the development of interpersonal skills towards Industry 5.0,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186x.2024.2375184.

Adel, “Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas,” Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications, vol. 11, no. 1, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5.

N. Aflisia, N. A. EQ, and A. Suhartini, “The Urgency of Theological Foundations in Islamic Education in the Industry Era 4.0 towards the Society Era 5.0,” International Journal of Education Research and Development, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–77, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.52760/ijerd.v1i1.4.

J. Alves, T. M. Lima, and P. D. Gaspar, “Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A systematic review,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 193, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11010193.

L. Bruce, K. Bellesini, B. Aisbett, E. J. Drinkwater, and P. Kremer, “A profile of the skills, attributes, development, and employment opportunities for sport scientists in Australia,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 419–424, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.12.009.

E. G. Carayannis, L. Dezi, G. Gregori, and E. Calo, “Smart Environments and Techno-Centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System view towards smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive solutions,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 926–955, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00763-4.

P. Crespí, J. M. García-Ramos, and M. Queiruga-Dios, “Project-Based Learning (PBL) and its impact on the development of interpersonal competences in higher education,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 259–276, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.7821/naer.2022.7.993.

F. Fraile, F. Psarommatis, F. Alarcón, and J. Joan, “A Methodological Framework for designing Personalised training Programs to support Personnel upskilling in Industry 5.0,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 224, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/computers12110224.

D. G. Broo, O. Kaynak, and S. M. Sait, “Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 25, p. 100311, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.

N. Haryanto, W. M. Kusuma, F. Mutohhari, M. Nurtanto, and S. Suyitno, “Innovation Media Learning: Online Project-Based Learning (O-PBL) on drawing competence in automotive engineering using video on YouTube,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 2111, no. 1, p. 012020, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2111/1/012020.

M. A. M. Hashim, I. Tlemsani, R. Mason-Jones, R. Matthews, and V. Ndrecaj, “Higher education via the lens of industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 9, p. 100828, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828.

S. Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, “Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 64, pp. 424–428, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010.

M. V. Huerta, A. R. Carberry, T. Pipe, and A. F. McKenna, “Inner engineering: Evaluating the utility of mindfulness training to cultivate intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies among first‐year engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 636–670, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20407

Z. Ilma, I. Wilujeng, A. Widowati, M. Nurtanto, and N. Kholifah, “A Systematic Literature Review of STEM Education in Indonesia (2016-2021): Contribution to Improving Skills in 21st Century Learning,” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, vol. 13, no. 02, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.02.17.

N. Imjai, T. Yordudom, B. Usman, T. Swatdikun, K. Meesook, and S. Aujirapongpan, “Unlocking accounting student success: The interplay of student activity participation, social skills, and emotional maturity through internships in Thailand,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 10, p. 100921, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100921

Diterbitkan
2025-11-14