ANALYSIS OF CARBON STOCK CONTENT IN MANGROVE ECOSYSTEMS IN JEROWARU, EAST LOMBOK REGENCY
Abstract
Mangrove ecosystems play a crucial role in climate change mitigation due to their ability to absorb and store carbon. The coastal area of Jerowaru, East Lombok Regency, has significant potential for mangrove ecosystem management. However, data on carbon content in mangroves in this region is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the carbon content in mangroves in the area. The objectives of this study include identifying the carbon content in various mangrove species in Jerowaru, East Lombok Regency, and evaluating the influence of biometric variables such as Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), tree height, and biomass on carbon content. This study uses a quantitative approach through direct field measurements and laboratory analysis. Mangrove samples were taken from several observation plots selected using purposive sampling based on mangrove density and species type. The variables measured include mangrove species, DBH, tree height, and biomass. Carbon content was calculated using scientifically validated allometric methods. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to assess the impact of biometric variables on carbon content. The results showed that carbon content varied among mangrove species. The species Rhizophora apiculata had a higher carbon content compared to Avicennia, Sonneratia alba, Ceriops tagal, and Avicennia rumphiana. Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) had a significant effect on carbon content (p < 0.05), while tree height and biomass also showed a positive effect, although not all were significant. The R-square (R²) value of the resulting model was 84.3%, indicating that 84.3% of the variation in carbon content can be explained by the variables in the model. This study reveals that mangrove species, DBH, tree height, and biomass contribute to carbon content in mangroves in the Jerowaru area, East Lombok Regency. The highest carbon content was recorded in Rhizophora apiculata. These findings emphasize the importance of sustainable mangrove ecosystem management to support climate change mitigation efforts. The results of this study can serve as a reference for coastal ecosystem management policies and mangrove conservation in the East Lombok area.
References
Asrat, Z., Eid, T., Gobakken, T., & Negash, M. (2020). Modelling and quantifying tree biometric properties of dry Afromontane forests of south ‑ central Ethiopia. Trees, 34(6), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-02012-8
Aye, W. N., Tong, X., & Tun, A. W. (2022). Species Diversity, Biomass and Carbon Stock Assessment of Kanhlyashay Natural Mangrove Forest. Forests, 13(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071013
B. Barbier, E., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., W. koch, E., C. stier, A., & R. Silliman, B. (2011). The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 81(2), 169–193.
Buditama, A. (2016). Blue carbon for reducing the impacts of climate change: An Indonesian case study. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 33(1), 68–88.
Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Mackenzie, R. A., Ainsworth, A., & P, A. Z. (2012). Whole-island carbon stocks in the tropical Paci fi c : Implications for mangrove conservation and upland restoration. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.004
Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., & Stidham, M. (2011). Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nature Geoscience, 4(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123
Duarte, C. M., Hendriks, I. E., Moore, T. S., Olsen, Y. S., Steckbauer, A., Ramajo, L., Carstensen, J., Trotter, J. A., & Mcculloch, M. (2013). Is Ocean Acidification an Open-Ocean Syndrome ? Understanding Anthropogenic Impacts on Seawater pH. 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9594-3
Fanous, M., Eden, J. M., Remesan, R., & Daneshkhah, A. (2023). Challenges and prospects of climate change impact assessment on mangrove environments through mathematical models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 162(February), 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105658
Gazali, Z., Jannah, S. W., Yulia, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2023). POTENTIAL OF CARBON SINK IN MANGROVE. 30(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.11598/btb.2023.30.3.1956
Hossain, M., Raqibul, M., & Siddique, H. (2012). Allometry , above-ground biomass and nutrient distribution in Ceriops decandra ( Griffith ) Ding Hou dominated forest types of the Sundarbans mangrove forest , Bangladesh. 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-012-9274-2
Kumar, P., Das, B., Majik, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2024). Coastal Ecosystem Services : Valuation , Threats , and Sustainable Way Forward. 24.
Locatelli, T., Binet, T., Kairo, J. G., King, L., Madden, S., Patenaude, G., Upton, C., & Huxham, M. (2014). Turning the Tide : How Blue Carbon and Payments for Ecosystem Services ( PES ) Might Help Save Mangrove Forests. 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0530-y
Maher, D. T., Call, M., Santos, I. R., Sanders, C. J., & Maher, D. T. (2018). Beyond burial : lateral exchange is a significant atmospheric carbon sink in mangrove forests.
Meng, Y., Bai, J., Gou, R., Cui, X., Feng, J., Dai, Z., Diao, X., Zhu, X., & Lin, G. (2021). Relationships between above- and below-ground carbon stocks in mangrove forests facilitate better estimation of total mangrove blue carbon. Carbon Balance and Management, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00172-9
Murdiyarso, D., Purbopuspito, J., Kau, J. B., Warren, M. W., Sasmito, S. D., Donato, D. C., Manuri, S., Krisnawati, H., & Taberima, S. (2015). The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. 5(December), 1089–1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2734
Nalau, J., & Becken, S. (2018). Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change : Review of Concepts Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change : Review of Concepts Griffith Institute for Tourism. August.
Pelluso, D., Hamacher, C., Calderucio, G., Estrada, D., Luiz, M., & Soares, G. (2014). Variability of carbon content in mangrove species : Effect of species , compartments and tidal frequency. Aquatic Botany, 120, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.10.004
Rahmadi, M. T., Yuniastuti, E., Suciani, A., & Harefa, M. S. (2023). Indonesian Journal of Earth Sciences Threats to Mangrove Ecosystems and Their Impact on Coastal Biodiversity : A Study on Mangrove Management in Langsa City. 03(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.52562/injoes.2023.627
Sitoe, A. A., Júnior, L., Mandlate, C., & Guedes, B. S. (2014). Biomass and Carbon Stocks of Sofala Bay Mangrove Forests. 1967–1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5081967
Sukuryadi, Johari, H. I., & Wijaya, A. (2024). Strategi Restorasi Ekosistem Mangrove di Kawasan Desa Lembar Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 22(6), 1455–1465. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.6.1455-1465
Syukur, A., & Santoso, D. (2021). Species diversity and composition , and above-ground carbon of mangrove vegetation in Jor Bay , East Lombok , Indonesia. 22(4), 2066–2071. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220455
Taillardat, P., Friess, D. A., Lupascu, M., Da, F., & Taillardat, P. (2018). Mangrove blue carbon strategies for climate change mitigation are most effective at the national scale.
Torre-castro, M. De, Di, G., & Jiddawi, N. S. (2014). Seagrass importance for a small-scale fishery in the tropics : The need for seascape management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 83(2), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.034
Vashum, K. T., & Jayakumar, S. (2012). Ecosystem & Ecography Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests - A Review. 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000116
Vorster, A. G., Evangelista, P. H., Stovall, A. E. L., & Ex, S. (2020). Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: The role of allometric equations. Carbon Balance and Management, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00143-6
Wolswijk, G., Trullols, A. B., Hug, J., Otero, V., Satyanarayana, B., Lucas, R., & Dahdouh-guebas, F. (2022). Can Mangrove Silviculture Be Carbon Neutral ? Remote Sensing, 14.