DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL FORESTRY PROGRAM: A CASE STUDY OF PULUKAN VILLAGE, BALI PROVINCE, INDONESIA

Gede Sedana

Gede Sedana Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Dwijendra University, Bali-Indonesia

Keywords: Social forestry, productivity, welfare, sustainability, training

Abstract

Increasing human needs and economic development encourage the use of land for settlements and agriculture and even encroach on areas around forests and even within forest areas. This condition can affect forest damage and have negative impacts such as flooding, decreased soil fertility, loss of flora and fauna and biodiversity, including climate change. Therefore, a sustainable and community-based forest management program is needed by paying attention to local wisdom in the community in order to create sustainable forests and provide social, economic, and other benefits. One of the forest management programs carried out in Bali Province is social forestry. This study aims to describe the implementation of social forestry and the principles of its implementation in an effort to improve the welfare of local communities and forest conservation. Social Forestry program has some goals, such as to (i) improve the condition of natural resources in forest areas in order to provide benefits for agriculture and communities around the forest; (ii) provide materials for firewood needed by communities around the forest; etc. To achieve this goal, social forestry implemented by the community at the study location through the Social Forestry Group (SFG) has implemented several important principles, namely productive, productivity, the welfare of farmers and local community, and sustainability. Some efforts needed are empowering the capacities of local community through the programs of socialization, agricultural extension and training for farmers through their groups related to agricultural diversification.

References

Agrawal, A. (2007). Forests, governance, and sustainability: common property theory and its contributions. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1),1:11–136.

Agung, J. T., & Indonesia, M. (n.d.). Tinjauan Morfologi Keausan Pahat Karbida Terhadap Rasio Pemampatan Tebal Geram pada Proses Bubut Tirus. WEBINAR & CALL for PAPER, 121.

Agusthe, B, Y. Ludang, Herianto, S. Murhaini, Misrita, Wahyudi. 2021. Social Forestry Development Strategy in Tumbang Tarusan Village of Central Kalimantan. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, Vol.7, No.3: 32-40.

Alma, F. 2020. Ekonomi Kerakyatan Pemikiran Mohammad Hatta Dan Relevansinya Pada Perekonomian Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Syariah. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7): 953–969.

Devkota, R. R. (2010). Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry: A Case Study of Nepal. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Gilmour, D., Malla, Y., & Nurse, M. (2004). Linkages between community forestry and poverty. Bangkok: Regional Community Forestry Center for Asia and the Pacific.

Gollin, D., S. Parente, and R. Rogerson, 2002. The Role of Agriculture in Development. American Economic Review 92 (1): 160-164.

Khorami, A.R. and S. Pierof. 2013. The Role of Agriculture in Iran’s Economic Development. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6(11): 1928-1939.

Mahardika, A., & Muyani, H. S. (2021). Analisis legalitas perhutanan sosial dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kabupaten Asahan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Kebijakan (JAPK), 1(1): 10–18.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ostrom, E., Hess, C. (2007). Private and Common Property Right. Workhshop in Political Theory and Policy analysis, and Centre for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental 10.2139/ssrn.1936062

Puspaningrum, D. (2015). Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Hutan dan Ekosistem (SDHAE) pada Masyarakat Desa Penyangga Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics) Vol. 8 No. 1:11-24. 13)

Pujo, S.T.F, Gunawan B, Suryati. (2018). Community Capacity Building in social forestry development: A review. Journal of regional and City Planning. April 11, 2018.

Putra, D. M. (2016). Kontribusi industri tekstil dalam penggunaan bahan berbahaya dan beracun terhadap rusaknya sungai Citarum. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 3(1: 133–152.

Salako, A. Lawrence, and Y. S. Aremu. 2015. Agriculture, Economic Growth And Development Nexus: Var Variance Decomposition Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom, Vol. III, Issue 6: 460-477.

Sinabutar, P., B. Nugroho, H. Kartodihardjo dan D. Darusman (2015). Kepastian Hukum dan Pengakuan Para Pihak Hasil Pengukuhan Kawasan Hutan Negara di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, Vol. 12 No. 1:27-40. 14)

Surat Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan nomor: SK. 6607/ MENLHKPSKL/PKPS/PSL.0/12/2016 tentang Pemberian Hak Pengelolaan Hutan Desa Kepada Lembaga Pengelolaan Hutan Desa Tumbang Tarusan.

Sukarman, S. (2018). Partisipasi Masyarakat Mitra Polhut pada Upaya Perlindungan dan Pengamanan Hutan di Taman Nasional Way Kambas. Jurnal Sylva Lestari Vol. 6 No. 1:85-98. 16)

Supriatna, A., I.K. Subagja, A. Hakim, C. Ermanto, A. Ali. 2024. Strategi Pengembangan Perhutanan Sosial Untuk Peningkatan Ekonomi Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 4 (6): 429-432 .

Suwarno, S., & R. Y. Bramantyo (2019). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kreatif Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan Lindung dan Hutan Produksi di Kecamatan Ngancar Kabupaten Kediri. Jurnal Mediasosian: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Administrasi Negara, Vol. 3, No. 2.

Syahputra, O. H. (2022). Masa depan kedaulatan pangan: dukungan agroforestri dalam produksi pangan melalui perhutanan sosial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pertanian, 4(1), 255–266.

Tietenberg, T., Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental and Natural Resources Economics 11th edition. Routledge.